separate telangana

---

there is demand for separate states in india especially telangana. regarding this even among communists there are lot of confusions. many feel that the jobs will increase by separate state (province) and the the injustice will end. the govt of inda announced separate state. it created disturbance.

---

A short look from a historical materialist POV into the origins and development of the feudal system, leading to its eventual downfall.

---

The realization of zero unemployment by means of expanding public services to include employment of last resort for consumer services

---

The wholesale absorption of all private-sector collective bargaining into free legal services by independent government agencies acting in good faith

---

Dont plagirize this If one wishes to join an environmental organization you don’t have to look far, but if one wants to find something different, they will find the Earth Liberation Front. The Earth Liberation front, or E.L.F. is an environmental group in which supporters use less than civil ways, to get the job done. E.L.F. was originally made from an offshoot of Earth First!, which is much like E.L.F. but the difference between them lie in what means are used to achieve their goal. So the radical members of Earth First! came together and created E.L.F. which concentrated more on less than legal means to achieve their goals. E.L.F. took over where Earth First! left off. There are no official members of E.L.F., and it really isn’t an organized group. Since the supporters commit illegal acts such as arson, they find it better for it just to be movement, because if something was done in their name, other members could be charged, or ultimately the group itself. It’s more of a guideline for action, as it says on earthliberationfront.com, “In the past …individuals...

---

Eco-malthusianism When the system fails people, the bourgeoisie instinctively responds by blaming those people for being inadequate and supernumerary to the system's requirements. During the 1980s, when there was a wave of anger and horror over the famines needlessly blighting parts of the African continent, it was a polemical commonplace to blame overpopulation. Today, a disaster known euphemistically as 'climate change' threatens the lives of millions, particularly the poorest millions. Predictably, there are those for whom the problem is too many people. In May this year, it was reported that a select coterie of billionaires - including Bill Gates, Warren Buffet and George Soros - was teaming up to combat overpopulation. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is already committing some of the immense wealth appropriated by Bill through his career in stolen software to tackling the problem. (Don't bother mulling over the quantity of CO2 emissions that were needlessly generated by the excess of production, retail and consumption entailed by Microsoft's practises...

ComradeMan- Anarchist

---

A brief look at the problem of defining what democracy is with mention of meritocracy.

---

Do you agree with these "Myths"

---

The title of this essay is rooted in the assumption that, prior to the Sino-Sovet split, there was an alliance of some kind between the two countries, characterized by amiable relations. This is an assumption that needs to be critiqued, as evidence suggests that under both Stalin and Khrushchev there was constant friction between the two parties, primarily due to the perceived failure of the USSR to meet the PRC's demands and recognize the latter country's autonomy, as well as the PRC's leading role in the international Communist movement, such that the split cannot be seen as the result of a sudden change in the USSR's policy but was in some way connected with a broad policy that had already been in place for some time, even if that policy had not hitherto led to conflict. As a consequence of this, it will be argued that the split was not due to ideological disagreements, even if it was justified as such, as the PRC's ideological arguments in the sphere of foreign policy were always designed to obscure or justify the internal contradictions of that policy and cannot be seen...

---

This essay is concerned with the class forces that enabled the CPC to come to power in 1949, marking the culmination of a prolonged civil war between the Communists and the KMT, as well as the class interests that were served by the reforms enacted by the new government as it swept to power. It will be argued that the revolution of 1949 was not a revolution of the working class, and that, whilst the CPC drew its support from the rural population, and its reforms resulted in significant changes to the patterns of land ownership in China, benefiting those peasants who had previously suffered intense exploitation at the hands of landlords and rich peasants, the Chinese revolution was ultimately enacted by a section of the intelligentsia, orientated towards the completion of the historic tasks that the bourgeoisie had been unable to carry out, especially national reunification, and the development of the productive apparatus. In taking this position, this essay aligns itself with Harris and other historians who have analyzed the Chinese experience within a Marxist framework, as...