Tab Content
No Recent Activity

62 Visitor Messages

  1. View Conversation
    I'll try not be lazy in the thread. Refreshing to hear some reason around this joint.
  2. View Conversation
    Holy shit, your post in the DoTP thread is fucking awesome.
  3. View Conversation
    Thanks for the clarification robbo...
  4. Yes . Although to be fair to Engels his view of the Labour Aristocracy was not the same as Lenin's . He talked of the workers of England feasting on the spoils of Englands global monopoly or something like that. The mechanism that allowed them to do that was different than what was offered by Lenin with the latter's idea of the LA being bribed out the "superprofits" created by the super exploitation of the colonies in his day
  5. View Conversation
    labour aristocracy post a valuable contribution to the debate. I hope others read it and think on. We have been hamstrung for 100yrs or more with the notion. I believe Engels had a hand in it...but not Marx. Lenin and others certainly. A day in the stocks for them.....
  6. Hi PFJ

    It seems the website has been hacked. You get redirected to an 'adult' website.
    Arminius tells me that the plan had been to "migrate everything over to the newer Wordpress site then switch the DNS to". Im not sufficiently computer savvy to say whether the contents of the site can be salvaged. If not it would be a huge pity becuase it had a great database. Fortunately I transferred some of the links to the "For Genuine Free Access Communism" group on Revleft. We shall see what happens
  7. View Conversation
    FYI: This came up when I tried to access the World In Common site:
  8. Hi RR Yes the website has been inactive for a while but is due to be overhauled. Best bet is to contact Arminiush via the main forum or the internal forum at There is also the "spaces of hope" blog cheers R
  9. View Conversation
    How can i join World in Common? It's website seems to be inactive
  10. Oh yeah and this is a load of nonsense too - "Marx did not believe that a state would not exist in lower-phase, he believed that a bourgeois state would not exist. In lower-stage communism/socialism, the state loses it's political functions and becomes an economic coordination mechanism". A state that loses its political function as instrument of class rule is no longer a state and in communism there are no classes and therefore there can be no state in Marxian terms. Where do you get these nonsensical ideas of yours from BTW?
Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 62
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
About robbo203

Basic Information

Date of Birth
November 30
About robbo203
Originally from South Africa, emigrated to UK and then Spain
Andalucia, Spain
economics , history, travel,
horny handed son of toil (gardener)
Political Statement:
anarcho communist
world in common
Organisation Contact Details:


For genuine free access communism


Total Posts
Total Posts
Posts Per Day
Visitor Messages
Total Messages
Most Recent Message
11th February 2014 17:54
Total Thanks
Total Thanks
General Information
Last Activity
29th December 2014 18:06
Join Date
17th December 2006

29 Friends

  1. Burn A Flag Burn A Flag is offline

    Designated Marxman

    Burn A Flag
  2. Delegado J Delegado J is offline


    Delegado J
  3. dernier combat dernier combat is offline


    dernier combat
  4. Dervish Dervish is offline


  5. EvilRedGuy EvilRedGuy is offline


  6. Grenzer Grenzer is offline

    Senior Revolutionary

  7. HEAD ICE HEAD ICE is offline


  8. Jose Gracchus Jose Gracchus is offline


    • Send a message via AIM to Jose Gracchus
    Jose Gracchus
  9. Kiev Communard Kiev Communard is offline


    Kiev Communard
  10. l'Enfermé l'Enfermé is offline


    • Send a message via MSN to l'Enfermé
    • Send a message via AIM to l'Enfermé
Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 29
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast