Go Back   RevLeft > Members List
Register FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

RevLeft Shortage Alert
RevLeft shortage alert! Current monthly donations are $22.50 below the monthly needed amount of $140. Help Revleft keep running - please subscribe for a monthly donation now!

Hermes is a name known to allHermes is a name known to allHermes is a name known to allHermes is a name known to allHermes is a name known to allHermes is a name known to all

Hermes Hermes is offline


Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 6 of 6
  1. Mistress Sinistra
    17th July 2014 01:53
    Mistress Sinistra
    You are great!
  2. blake 3:17
    6th December 2013 04:49
    blake 3:17
    Do you know anything about the history of the fight against South African apartheid?
  3. Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
    25th August 2013 10:25
    Admiral Swagmeister G-Funk
    hey, did you find any decent reading that's critical of pornography?
  4. Blake's Baby
    31st January 2013 00:11
    Blake's Baby
    Materialism posits material conditions as being the source of consciousness. While, on the thread, I may have been arguing that 'if everyone stopped believing in capitalism capitalism would stop' I don't believe capitalism's domination of the world is ideological; I don't propose 'changing everyone's minds' or 'teaching everyone socialism'. I think it is people's reflection on their material conditions - which include struggling with their colleagues at work and seeing the shit life that capitalism has in store for us - that produce a revolutionary consciousness. Not that I don't think capitalism is essentially an idea/set of behaviours of course, because it is; but the ideas of millions or billions of people don't change suddenly without material causes.
  5. Blake's Baby
    31st January 2013 00:10
    Blake's Baby
    Sure, they're different people, that explains why they see the world differently. But if all materialism says is 'things happen for reasons but we'll never know what they are' then it isn't really very useful.

    We believe that 'classes' exist and we can make certian predictions based on that, but we can never predict how individuals will react, because we can never take everything into account. Even with classes we have to be cagey. The bourgeoisie, we're pretty confident, will maintain its role as long as it can. The proletariat? Much more difficult to predict. On the one hand, it's compelled to resist in order to protect its own conditions of life, which could lead to going on the offensive; but, it is being appressed so mightily that it may be impossible to offer meaningful resistance. From a class point of view, there are 3 possibilities; resistance, offense, or submission. But from an individual point of view there are multiple options.

    OK - gotta take a break, post's too long
  6. Blake's Baby
    30th January 2013 22:07
    Blake's Baby
    Well, I don't think the connection between material conditions and consciousness is a direct one. Two people may be in the same situation - they might both be fired from their shit jobs, for instance - and when they come to reason why, one might blame his boss, and the other might blame the Polish guy who lives down the street and 'does the same job for next to nothing'. The same conditions produce different explanations, because our consciousness is not a mechanistic reflection of our circumstances. There's another process going on which is our self-reflection.

    Otherwise revolution would be like trigonometery or statistics. a-amount of suffering x b-amount of time / c-percentage of people who get pissed off = d-date of revolution. It's not like that.


Total Posts
Visitor Messages
Total Thanks
General Information
  • Last Activity: Today 19:37
  • Join Date: 7th February 2012
  • Referrals: 0


Showing Friends 1 to 2 of 2

All times are GMT. The time now is 19:57.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.