Sinister Cultural Marxist

http://www.revleft.com/vb/fascist-an...91#post2457929
thanks man
well watch your back , it appears some ''café communist here are back stabbers

You make good arguments in that 1944 Crimean thread...can't believe people are arguing that (apologizing for) an ethnic cleansing of a region is "fine" as long as so-called "socialists" are doing it. Those people are fucking demented.

Is it true you support state capitalism?

That is fair enough then. But yeah, I don't see how covering up stuff like this is ever acceptable.

It's futile arguing with idiots like Rodrigo, they are either:

a) trolls, OR
b) informed only by online tankie nationalist bullshit sentiment, and haven't any clue about the real world and politics and people.

Still, appreciate that your post in the NK poll thread absolutely ripped him to shreds, the idiot. Good read!

I've responded: http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...2&postcount=34

Well, they didn't have any reasons to ban me.

Anarcho-Communists aren't revisionist whatsoever, because their movement is entirely unrelated to Marxism-Leninism.

Trotskyism is revisionist because it deviates from Marxism-Leninism, same with Left Communism I guess.

The USSR under Stalin was much less 'top-down' than Khrushchev and beyond.

I do not agree with Stalin's decision to ban homosexuality, he may have had a reason but it had very little effect and was just a plan hatched from his paranoia.

There are only really three revisionist types.

Titoists (Market Socialism)
Soviet Union post-1953 (Peaceful co-existence as well as numerous economic changes)
Maoists (Three Worlds Theory, numerous other beliefs too, only Hoxhaists believe Maoism is revisionist)

Revisionism isn't an insult we throw around, it is a factual statement that applies to 2 or 3 beliefs.

so give green light on pederasts and are you so sensative to cossacks as well??