Kowalski

also i hear you are from a muslim background. Then you may want to discuss the subject with this comrade from the Workers Party of Belgium ( secular muslim, communist and homosexual)

http://www.revleft.com/vb/member.php?u=28977

He gave a good workshop once about "marxism and LGTB rights, left and right-wing perspectives in the movement"

[part 3] In this part you were right, the emancipation of the working-class IS ESSENTIAL. But you cant scapegoat any of these substruggles as not important, or even worse, calling them a product of capitalism. To excuse yourselves from being homophobic with "its russian culture, and homosexuality is a western thing" is just plain chauvinist. socialism is the emancipation of the human race on a scientific basis, this includes all oppresion of humans by humans. I know RCYL-b cc members agree with me on this position, and its also essential to know this in order to have an equal understanding with most comrades in the world.

[part 2] Women dont just go to demonstrate "to be proud of being female" they demonstrate becuase they are discriminated in the workplace and subjegated to men. Opressed minorities dont demonstrate because of the "nationalism" but because they are being opressed by someone elses supposed etnhic supperiority. Homosexuals dont go wanting to show off their "gayness", but because they are being attacked and discriminated in a society.

Feminism, national-liberation, Ecology and Gay rights on their own, without class politics and socialism included are worthless. In the west alot of these movements lost their class characters and degenerated into identity politics, which emphasises on the single issue. They see these movements as homogeneous (rich and poor single issues are more important then class). This degenerated these movements into the capitalist cultural hegemonic framework. You now also have reactionary gayright movements, female amazonism, balant nationalism and green-capitalism.

sorry to see you restricted, but its kind of justified considering the homophobic arguements you used, that are exactly the same for defending racism or sexism. (although they shouldnt have restricted you so soon)

Homosexuality, Bisexuality (which i am myself, so you can understand why im offended), or Transgenders, like every demographic, devided by class. I'm just going to leave out the scientific explanations for homosexuality, because thats a different discussion. Working-class women have nothing to do with high placed socialites and upper-class women, just like black americans dont have anything in common with condoleeza rice. Working class jews dont have anything in common with wealthy ones. And working-class homosexuals, who just want to be excepted for who they are, dont have anything in common with wealthy homosexuals who equate homosexuality with extravagant consumerism.

LOL I just was very surprised when I saw anti-dialectical group in revolutionary forum. I was very interested who can argue against dialectic and with which arguments, and I was going to argue with them. Of course if it smth enough serious and not just a kind of joke or crazyness.

hey comrade, why did you join the "anti-dialectics" group? it is the basis for scientific socialism. It is founded by a bitter old nutjob who distorts it into being some kind of "stalinist religion"

I have split the discussion on the Russian left's homophobia problem into a new thread. Please post in it and reply to my points when you see this. Link

Hello. I wrote about them in introduction topic. That organisation became a base for more broad "Left Front" and practically AKM itself no more exist, only like part of this Left Front.

There are big differences within this organisation. They were in AKM and they became more serious in LF. Some comrades are genuine communists but usually with lack of theoretic education. Others even don't try to studying. Discipline level isn't very high.
And the main thing for them is actionism if I correctly name it. They concentrate themselves on actions, actions and once more actions, not always as a part of well-planned strategy, not always really useful, more often for PR mainly.

I don't think this organisation as a whole is genuinely revolutionary. Some comrades within it are, but not org-ion.

Hello, have you ever heard of a group called AKM 1917? Are they genuinely revolutionary?