ckaihatsu

communist supply & demand -- Model of Material Factors

This is an 8-1/2" x 40" wide table that describes a communist-type political / economic model using three rows and six descriptive columns. The three rows are surplus-value-to-overhead, no surplus, and surplus-value-to-pleasure. The six columns are ownership / control, associated material values, determination of material values, material function, infrastructure / overhead, and propagation.

http://tinyurl.com/ygybheg

Radhika Desai put up a chart that listed different sources of for crises in a capitalist economy. I think you might find it interesting; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NmrJyL1nQU8
the chart becomes visible around 2:30

http://www.revleft.com/vb/showpost.p...3&postcount=50


Currently production requires [1] labor, and [2] capital, right? Without the abstracted, bullshit capital-market-pricing valuation at play we would have to have a *political economy* that *collectively, consciously* assumes mass control and planning over society's productive capacities, right?

But this *political* aspect doesn't speak to the *labor* component in a post-capitalist political economy -- sure no one could be blackmailed into work roles against their basic human living needs, but how would the potential, willing labor *supply* be treated by the *larger*, *overarching* political society -- the "demand" -- ?

This is where *past work completed*, quantified into labor credits, would confer a kind of *seniority* or *labor social status* in organizing the (numerically smaller) supply of labor to potentially meet the (numerically larger) population's requests ("demand") for production runs.

The material proceeds would become the resources of the collective, common population. In terms of actual possession and consumption, *that* would all be *pre-planned*, right? It would have had to go through a mass political decision-making policy process in order to even be *initiated* in the first place -- so everything is according to political will, set quantities, schedules, and logistics.

The workers who work on any given production run do *not necessarily* have to be the *consumers* of the resulting products -- they could even be *traveling* / *itinerant* laborers who are not *from* the locality -- *this* is another good reason for introducing a labor-hours credits system, so that a locality has the *flexibility* of finding suitable labor without being *tied down* to geographical constraints, or a labor workforce's *personal* interests and *personal* voluntarism.

Hey, communist_usa, thanks for posting the excellent article about Derrion Albert. It makes a cogent point that the youths have their best interests with the [minority-oppressed] community that they're from, interests that could *not* be better represented by the overarching power structure of the capitalist state.

Hello comrade!

Can you change the filters on your e-translator, or use Google Translate?

I have a favour to ask of you not to use symbols *...* around words which you wish to have under accent because many of foreigners (me too) use e-translator and it ignores such kind of words for translating.

Please be my friend.

Political (educational) diagrams, for revolutionaries

http://www.revleft.com/vb/political-...36#post1541836