RevLeft
Go Back   RevLeft > Members List
Register FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

RevLeft Shortage Alert
RevLeft shortage alert! Current monthly donations are $7.50 below the monthly needed amount of $140. Help Revleft keep running - please subscribe for a monthly donation now!


AK is an unknown quantity at this point

AK AK is offline

Banned

Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 401 to 410 of 902
  1. ∞
    3rd July 2010 06:49
    v no thats what people say
  2. ∞
    3rd July 2010 05:15
    Well I am a "Motherfucking Burgeoise theorist, who can never admit he's wrong."
  3. ∞
    3rd July 2010 05:05
    Oh wait I saw it LOLOLOL
  4. ∞
    3rd July 2010 04:57
    Give me the link
  5. ∞
    3rd July 2010 03:12
    grrr
  6. ∞
    3rd July 2010 03:01
    Ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuuuuuck
  7. ∞
    3rd July 2010 02:15
    Oh yeah? What did it say?
  8. ∞
    3rd July 2010 01:41
    No you're just mad cuz you dont know what it said
  9. ∞
    3rd July 2010 01:30
    lol you can't read this cuz its black lol [/COLOR]
  10. ∞
    3rd July 2010 01:19
    whoa...cool

About Me

  • About AK
    Biography
    Generic Marxist → Leninist → Trotskyist → Council Communist → Anarchist
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Interests
    Bringing down the walls of society that the ruling class holds dear, doing whatever.
    Occupation
    High School Student (Year 10)
    Political Statement
    Autogestion & Autonomy
    Gender
    Male

Statistics

Total Posts
Visitor Messages
Blog
Total Thanks
General Information
  • Last Activity: 7th December 2010 04:00
  • Join Date: 5th September 2009
  • Referrals: 0

Friends

Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 65

Contact Info

Instant Messaging
Send an Instant Message to AK Using...
Home Page
http://libcom.org/user/alpha-kappa
This Page
http://www.revleft.com/vb/member.php?u=25728

Blog

View AK's BlogRecent Entries
Latest Blog Entry

Posted 22nd April 2010 at 12:46 by AK Comments 4
"Reform or revolution?" is one of the biggest and most controversial questions asked when it comes to creating a socialist society. One question that is rarely asked is that of the class rule that should come place after the revolution. Whilst all socialists agree it must be democratic, there are other questions that need to be asked - but rarely are. Questions such as "Will this democracy be representative or direct?" The answer lies in how minority classes come to rule society....

Posted 12th April 2010 at 10:50 by AK Comments 7
Posted in Uncategorized
[B][I]Bourgeoise [/I]- as well as other similar misspellings - are not words. It pisses me off when people misspell or incorrectly use these leftist terms. Learn how to correctly spell and use them. I can't stress this enough.[/B]

[B]Bourgeoisie (Noun): [/B]The upper ruling capitalist class of private property owners which do not work on the means of production that they own; instead, hiring workers to carry out the labour.
[B]Bourgeois (Adjective): [/B]Of or relating to the...

Posted 3rd April 2010 at 10:10 by AK Comments 0
All classes, past and present, have been and are defined by their relation to productive property. Under capitalism this can be shown by observing an individual's relation to the means of production (also known as private property; as opposed to personal property which includes tangible items as well as houses, cars, trucks and boats): the working class of Proletarians which own no means of production of their own have to sell their labour to the Bourgeoisie (or sometimes the Petit-Bourgeoisie)...

Posted 7th March 2010 at 11:49 by AK Comments 7
[COLOR=Black][B]UPDATE: This entry has been superseded by [URL="http://www.revleft.com/vb/blog.php?b=891"][I]The Myth of the Middle Class: Blurring Class Lines and Dividing Labour[/I][/URL][/B]

All historical and current social classes are defined by property ownership or their relation to production. So where does this ambiguous "middle class" fit in with respect to property ownership or a relation to production? Nowhere, it is merely an attempt to disprove Marxist...

Posted 3rd March 2010 at 07:35 by AK Comments 0
[B][I]ALL [/I]war is for the purposes of economic dominance.

[/B]Even a Communist revolution (if violent - which will inevitably always be as the state has become too powerful) is for the purposes of economic dominance as it entails the working class of Proletarians taking over the economy and placing the means of production and distribution under democratic control - not the control of a privileged few.

Just as in any other war, the spoils will go to the victor in Iraq....
Recent Comments
You glued everything...
Posted 3rd June 2010 at 00:50 by Karl Marx AK47 Karl Marx AK47 is offline
[QUOTE=CartCollector;bt2558]I...
Posted 27th April 2010 at 07:45 by AK AK is offline
I agree. The problems...
Posted 27th April 2010 at 02:33 by CartCollector CartCollector is offline
You can avoid all the...
Posted 25th April 2010 at 11:33 by AK AK is offline
What are your thoughts...
Posted 25th April 2010 at 02:47 by CartCollector CartCollector is offline

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.