Go Back   RevLeft > Members List
Register FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

RevLeft Shortage Alert
RevLeft shortage alert! Current monthly donations are $30.00 below the monthly needed amount of $110. Help Revleft keep running and to be completely free of adverts again - please subscribe for a monthly donation now (starting at $2.50) and get all adverts removed immediately! (no obligation, subscription can be cancelled anytime)

Invader Zim has disabled reputation
Committed User

Invader Zim Invader Zim is offline

Vile intellectual hack

Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 1 to 10 of 61
  1. ComradeOm
    22nd November 2015 20:20
    Just commented on that thread. It's a bit shocking as to how far Rafiq's regressed. Before he was merely ignorant - which we all are when starting out - but now he's disappeared into his own little world. It's what happens, perhaps, when there's no a redstar or Led Zeppelin around to shred his bluster. Bit sad but I'm trying to see the funny side.

    (Quality necro though.)

    And I do miss our debates actually. I feel my reading's gotten a bit narrow since we stopped sparring: I've gone deep(er) into Soviet history without having the excuse to step back into the broader picture. Let me know if there's other places on the internet where you argue with people.
  2. ComradeOm
    22nd November 2015 19:53
    Just popping in to see how things have/haven't changed. That I'm still around is because Rafiq has gone hilariously mad. But fair play to yourself for sticking around this long though - can't imagine there's much interesting debate going?

    And I've mellowed slightly on Finkel & Leibovitz. I still maintain that the broad outline (of pro-German/anti-Soviet sentiment in the British establishment) is useful but, on reflection, the specifics of their proposed 'deal' with Hitler is unsupported by the evidence presented. But I don't think my position on appeasement has changed that much.
  3. A.J.
    1st October 2015 14:35
    "I was called a 'vile intellectual hack' by a Stalinist fool who took exception to having his inane ramblings about the Second World War dismantled - a feeling doubtless that you are familiar with."

    If your going invent a fictitious story regarding the origin of your pretentious user title you can at least try and concoct something with at least a semblance of plausibility.

    Once again you've fallen on your sword, attempting to self-promote yourself as being really clever yet exposing yourself as a bit of a boob.(making a complete and utter embarrassment of yourself in the process.)
  4. Ele'ill
    8th August 2015 16:53
    oh ya, I mean I thought back in the day we used to basically take the same position kind of like now in rafiq's fantasy thread
  5. Ele'ill
    8th August 2015 15:38
    i can't keep everyone's positions straight but did you and I used to end up in those types of planetary crusade threads often?
  6. A.J.
    5th June 2015 16:18
    "your earlier humiliation?"

    I love this incessant contrived condescension of yours.

    Just for your information, I don't think you are any kind of intellect. Not in the slightest, contrary to attempts to portray yourself as such.

    Your just a pretentious charlatan.
  7. A.J.
    1st June 2015 15:32
    If anyone is a fool it's you.
    Pretentiously self-describing yourself as "intellectual" and claiming you "dismantled"(you really shouldn't flatter yourself) someone's arguments when in reality you just made an utter embarrassed of yourself by praising the foreign policy of the British government in the 1930s in the most cringeworthy and fawning terms imaginable.

    "Stalinist fool"

    You sort of let the cat out bag here. The use of the term "Stalinist" as a perjorative proves that your motivations in vilifying Soviet foreign policy are petty sectarianism rather anything resembling a sober analysis of the concrete situation.

    Lastly, lose the contrived attempts at condescension as I really really don't think your intelligent.
    Not in the slightest.
  8. A.J.
    25th May 2015 14:14
    Calling you an apologist for British imperialism isn't meant as an insult but an observation.

    Also, anyone who self-proclaims themselves to be an intellectual is a bit on the pretentious side.
  9. Palmares
    25th September 2014 04:10
    Nice to see you are still posting on here. Very few old school folk like us around. Even if we disagree on things...
  10. Trap Queen Voxxy
    24th June 2014 13:19
    Trap Queen Voxxy
    So I think your super smart and I'm not trying to be snarky so please don't get mad at me or be mean in the thread. I genuinely just want to have this convo. TY. I only say this cuz lots of people here think it's ok to be mean to me because I my writing style and lack of education.

About Me

  • About Invader Zim
    Political Statement
    Judean People's Front crack suicide squad!
  • Signature
    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    - Hanlon's Razor


Total Posts
Visitor Messages
Total Thanks
General Information
  • Last Activity: Today 14:26
  • Join Date: 9th November 2002
  • Referrals: 0


Showing Friends 11 to 19 of 19

All times are GMT. The time now is 22:28.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.