Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Red Brigade
Also dose the PSL support Socialism in One Country?
|
Well I think Kassad already answered that question in the above post. Of course socialism in one country is not a desirable thing, but if it's what we got then that's what we have to work with right? The "Socialism in one country" was only the practical line that could be taken at the time as socialist countries were not emerging through revolutionary action in the rest of the world, especially in Europe,(That is to say the revolutionary action was not successful in workers taking State power)that could support the USSR. So I think the phrase "Socialism in One Country" has to be put into it's historical context as such, at the time of 1924 the USSR was isolated as the only State trying to implement socialism with economic imperialism, previous invasion which left the already undeveloped country in ruins, and a lot of class enemies within(Damn kulaks). So I believe in a situation like that you're going to see distortions and deformities like Kassad said. But I believe we have to stand in solidarity with them and have to make the revolutionary situation ourselves in our own country so we wouldn't have "Socialism in One Country" lines of thought, because those situations only cause distortions, socialism is not supposed to be isolated to one country and a single country can't last forever with the imperialists at their necks.