RevLeft
Go Back   RevLeft > General > Philosophy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Chat Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Philosophy Philosophise with fellow RevLeft members on varied topics such as existence, the human condition, or philosophy itself.

Forum Led by: Dean

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #41  
Old 1st February 2008, 06:41
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

What would set theory say - that all things have a complement?
Lynx ~ 'Lynx
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 1st February 2008, 06:45
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

It says that all sets have a compliment; it says nothing about 'things'.

But, even if it did, that would have ontological implications only for Platonists.
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 1st February 2008, 07:28
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

Most sets include things, except for the empty set, {} which includes nothing.
Thus the set of all things, U, would have a complement, U' ?

I find that peanut butter complements a banana nicely.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 1st February 2008, 09:33
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Lynx:

Quote:
Most sets include things, except for the empty set, {} which includes nothing.
Sets include elements, which are well-defined mathematically; the word 'thing' is no use at all here.

Quote:
Thus the set of all things, U, would have a complement, U' ?
Maybe so, but this has nothing to do with 'things', still less with the material world.
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 1st February 2008, 20:44
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosa Lichtenstein View Post
Lynx:
Sets include elements, which are well-defined mathematically; the word 'thing' is no use at all here.
Sets can include anything, including fuzzy stuff.
Quote:
Maybe so, but this has nothing to do with 'things', still less with the material world.
Yes, but I believe Venn diagrams are a better tool for understanding certain relationships than words or numbers alone. For example, if I drew two circles with one intersection and labeled the circle on the left Communism, the one on the right Capitalism and the intersection Socialism, would that be an accurate enough representation for the average apolitical person?

Set theory and geometry were about the only times I had fun in math class
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 1st February 2008, 22:33
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Lynx:

Quote:
Sets can include anything, including fuzzy stuff.
Now, this is where we enter controversial territory; this is a hotly contested subject in the philosophy of mathematics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensional_definition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensional_definition

I personally think that mathematics went astray in the late 19th century when certain influential theorists accepted an extensional definition of a set (which would allow sets to contain anything you like; this transformed mathematics into a poor copy of empirical science, and led, among other things, to Godel's ridiculous theorem).

But, even if you (or this approach) were right, it must be possible to say which items are elements of a particular set and which are not.

In that case, it will have to be well-defined, as I said.
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 1st February 2008, 22:40
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

The background to my way of viewing mathematics and set theory can be found here:

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wi...n-mathematics/
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 2nd February 2008, 00:29
gilhyle gilhyle is offline
Senior Revolutionary
Commie Club Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,652
Rep Power: 7
Reputation: 140
gilhyle will become famous soon enoughgilhyle will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosa Lichtenstein View Post
Gil:



This seems to treat 'statements' as if they were proper names
No it doesnt...try that line of argument on science and see where it gets you,....probably Lakatos. Your taking short cuts Rosa.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 2nd February 2008, 00:51
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Gil:

Quote:
try that line of argument on science and see where it gets you
I like the way you settle things in logic -- ask a scientist!
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 2nd February 2008, 17:38
INDK's Avatar
INDK INDK is offline
dismantle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: exalted places
Posts: 377
Rep Power: 3
Reputation: 76
INDK will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Look at it this way: a not-banana may not be defined (indeterminate being), but neither is a banana. A banana requires some defining characteristics (determinate being) to mean something; things like color, shape, and taste, all of which have clear opposites. So chow down on your not-banana!
But wouldn't "not-banana" imply all things that are not bananas? Opposites should be, as you say, "clear opposites". Thus, hot-cold are opposites, but hot and not-hot cannot be opposites as that would imply banana is the opposite of hot, as well as me and you, every poster in this thread, the computer you type on, and all other things that are not the entity we call "hot". "not-" is too vague to imply an opposite.
__________________
R.I.P. Tech.
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:12
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Escape Artist, you are right in much of what you say, but those who are lost in this mystical way of viewing things long ago gave up on good sense, and are quite happy to derive fundamental cosmic principles from a brief consideration of a few words (most notoriously, the word 'not').

Science on the cheap, or what?
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/

Last edited by Rosa Lichtenstein; 3rd February 2008 at 04:34.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:23
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosa Lichtenstein View Post
Lynx:



Now, this is where we enter controversial territory; this is a hotly contested subject in the philosophy of mathematics:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensional_definition

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensional_definition

I personally think that mathematics went astray in the late 19th century when certain influential theorists accepted an extensional definition of a set (which would allow sets to contain anything you like; this transformed mathematics into a poor copy of empirical science, and led, among other things, to Godel's ridiculous theorem).

But, even if you (or this approach) were right, it must be possible to say which items are elements of a particular set and which are not.

In that case, it will have to be well-defined, as I said.
One controversy is with regard to infinite sets and the other with rough sets?
'Communism' as a set would be finite and rough.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:26
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Lynx:

Quote:
One controversy is with regard to infinite sets and the other with rough sets?
No, it's over how we define a set and its allowed elements.

There are no useful links I could find other than these; there are loads of books and articles if you are interested...
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:30
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosa Lichtenstein View Post
The background to my way of viewing mathematics and set theory can be found here:

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/wi...n-mathematics/
This is largely incomprehensible for me. Wittgenstein has a problem with infinite sets and set theory, that much I can tell. Why? If infinite sets don't exist in the practical sense then the sets we use are merely subsets or samplings. The purpose of using Venn diagrams in high school was to aid in understanding certain relationships, not to be comprehensive.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:34
Lynx Lynx is offline
Direct Democracy
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,590
Rep Power: 5
Reputation: 164
Lynx has a spectacular aura aboutLynx has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rosa Lichtenstein View Post
Lynx:
No, it's over how we define a set and its allowed elements.
A finite set can be enumerated, so that ought to end the extensional controversy.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 2nd February 2008, 18:45
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Not so. All that does is re-iterate the extensional point of view.

Intensionalists criticise this since it is unclear from this 'definition' what counts as a legitimate element of a set, and what does not. That cannot be left to chance in mathematics.

This book makes things a little clearer:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=0...mbnail#PPP7,M1
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/

Last edited by Rosa Lichtenstein; 3rd February 2008 at 00:25.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 2nd February 2008, 22:01
ComradeRed's Avatar
ComradeRed ComradeRed is offline
Senior Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,783
Blog Entries: 3
Rep Power: 9
Reputation: 92
ComradeRed will become famous soon enough
Default

I would love to see a dialectician provide a coherent explanation of what the opposite of an "angry man" is.

Is it a "happy man", an "angry woman", or a "happy woman"?
__________________
TragicClown: "i'm not though...i'm how like, every conservative christian father would want their daughter to behave"
Intelligitimate: "The bible has gang-rape in it...I like the Bible."
"The right to enslave is a positive right." - Tungsten
"The hand-mill gives you society with the feudal lord; the steam-mill society with the industrial capitalist." Karl Marx
People who cheated me out of a mathematical proof: Jazzremington, Severian, Che y Marijuana
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 3rd February 2008, 00:24
Rosa Lichtenstein's Avatar
Rosa Lichtenstein Rosa Lichtenstein is online now
Committed Revolutionary
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Greater Manchester, UK
Posts: 13,354
Rep Power: 28
Reputation: 1002
Rosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profoundRosa Lichtenstein is profound
Default

Indeed, and what is the opposite of Chomsky's example: pretty little girls school?
__________________
Hegelism is like a mental disease -- you cannot know what it is until you get it, and then you can't know because you have got it -- Max Eastman.

Enroll on the dialectics detox program here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/index.htm

Basic Introductory Essay here: http://anti-dialectics.co.uk/Why%20I%20Oppose%20DM.htm

Also check out: http://www.leninology.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 3rd February 2008, 02:37
INDK's Avatar
INDK INDK is offline
dismantle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: exalted places
Posts: 377
Rep Power: 3
Reputation: 76
INDK will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Science on the cheap, or what?
You said it. Some contemporary philosophical concepts discussed (especially here on RL) entail extremely vague, rather mysticist posters.
__________________
R.I.P. Tech.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 3rd February 2008, 04:02
Volderbeek's Avatar
Volderbeek Volderbeek is offline
Anarcho-Taoist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 225
Rep Power: 3
Reputation: 11
Volderbeek is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to Volderbeek
Default Hot or Not?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Violent Proletarian View Post
But wouldn't "not-banana" imply all things that are not bananas? Opposites should be, as you say, "clear opposites". Thus, hot-cold are opposites, but hot and not-hot cannot be opposites as that would imply banana is the opposite of hot, as well as me and you, every poster in this thread, the computer you type on, and all other things that are not the entity we call "hot". "not-" is too vague to imply an opposite.
That's an interesting thought, but I believe you're just confusing what is meant here by "not". I'm referring to the logical operator NOT, not the algebraic operator not-equal.
__________________
"By all means, let us destroy fascism, but let the same destructive flame consume all ideologies, and all their lackeys to boot." - Raoul Vaneigem

"Don't glorify heroes, And people will not contend.
Don't treasure rare objects, And no one will steal.
Don't display what people desire, And their hearts will not be disturbed." - Tao Te Ching

THE WORKERS HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT THEIR CHAINS! THEY HAVE A WORLD TO WIN!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
opposite, things

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
if bin laden was sat opposite you cubist Trashcan 41 19th June 2008 18:59
What's the opposite to free trade? R_P_A_S Learning... 19 5th September 2006 07:49
Whats the opposite of authoritarian methods... drain.you Theory 12 5th March 2006 05:53
The opposite of pacifism Kun Fanâ Trashcan 23 3rd December 2004 18:27
YAP holding a vigil In protest at Israel - opposite down str Reuben Practice & Propaganda 1 10th April 2002 19:07


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:36.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Zoints SEO v2.3.0 by Zoints & DxLwebs.com

Che Guevara Shirts, T-shirts, Tshirts, tees, merchandise