Go Back   RevLeft > dez
Register FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

RevLeft Shortage Alert
RevLeft shortage alert! Current monthly donations are $40.00 below the monthly needed amount of $110. Help Revleft keep running and to be completely free of adverts again - please subscribe for a monthly donation now (starting at $2.50) and get all adverts removed immediately! (no obligation, subscription can be cancelled anytime)

Conversation Between dez and Brother No. 1
Showing Visitor Messages 11 to 20 of 49
  1. dez
    14th April 2009 06:00
    bear in mind that the very intention of the debate is not to rationalize anything but to promote a political agenda..
  2. Brother No. 1
    14th April 2009 05:58
    Brother No. 1
    Darn..I have to go solo now..Damn i hate doing that.
  3. dez
    14th April 2009 05:49
    ill get on it later, cant do it atm
  4. Brother No. 1
    14th April 2009 05:30
    Brother No. 1
    Please check the "is Stalin as bad as hitler" thread to protect Stalin's name.
  5. Brother No. 1
    10th April 2009 06:42
    Brother No. 1
    Yeah. Mao knew what he was doing and knew the costs but watching and allowing Counter-Revolutionary actions couldnt be tolerated.
  6. dez
    10th April 2009 06:41
    Stalin and mao had a great relationship - both personally and diplomatically, but I think the fundamental reason in the split was kruschovs pacification policy. He intended to approach SU to the west and demobilize the soviet proletariat, something that is counter revolutionary at heart and could not be tolerated.
  7. Brother No. 1
    10th April 2009 06:39
    Brother No. 1
    Yes for he and Stalin were comrades and when she was told his comrade was a "Mass murder" he didnt believe and hated the Revisionist for doing that. He had good reasons.
  8. dez
    10th April 2009 06:37
    Had sino soviet relations not been destroyed, most of asia (and consequently, of the world) would be socialist.
    It would be a matter of time before a world revolution, the defeat in germany would be a black dot in history...

    Mao was in a great deal responsible for distancing PRC from SU, with good reason, and he also left deng xiaoping alive, also with good reason.
  9. Brother No. 1
    10th April 2009 06:33
    Brother No. 1
    Nika brought a end to the Sino-Soviet Relations. Nika brought a end to the Anti-Revisonism in the CCCP, a sad day, and Deng brought a end to Maoism in China after Mao's death. they basicly copied the Russian Revisionist way of taking a Socialist leader and denouncing him and making them in control.
  10. dez
    10th April 2009 06:31
    Perhaps. I dont know.
    I think Kruschov brought the end to the peoples republic over his revisionist policies, deng was unavoidable.

All times are GMT. The time now is 17:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.