RevLeft
Go Back   RevLeft > Blogs > AK
Register FAQ Members List RevLeft Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.

Class Rule And The Right Way To Do It

Posted 22nd April 2010 at 13:46 by AK
Updated 18th June 2010 at 10:47 by AK

"Reform or revolution?" is one of the biggest and most controversial questions asked when it comes to creating a socialist society. One question that is rarely asked is that of the class rule that should come place after the revolution. Whilst all socialists agree it must be democratic, there are other questions that need to be asked - but rarely are. Questions such as "Will this democracy be representative or direct?" The answer lies in how minority classes come to rule society.

A minority ruling class needs to have configured itself to be able to be brought to power by creating systems that concentrate power into the hands of a few. Whether those systems are representative democratic or dictatorial doesn't change the power granted to minorities. It doesn't matter how rulers come to rule, but that rulers rule in the first place. The ruling Bourgeoisie of today are a class that rule in both the political and economical domains. How do they do this? A system that concentrated wealth into the hands of a few had to be created. That system is capitalism and it relies on private property rights. By ruling both the political and economical domains, the Bourgeoisie is able to rule society. The simple concept of wealth equalling power shows this. Power and influence are brought to those with wealth - and wealth is vital in bringing anyone to power. So for someone to have power, they must have wealth beforehand. This explains the corruption and unfairness that is rife in the representative democratic elections we take part in today. The show "democratic" process that we participate in today are determined by money. This is clearly illustrated in the donations given to Australian political parties by corporations and the Electoral Commission. In the 2004 Parliamentary elections, the Australian Labor party received $19,145,899 in corporate donations; the Liberal party received $19,293,075. The Greens - an environmentalist party that would lower big businesses' profits through it's actions - received a paltry $438,133 in corporate donations. Corporations have in the past and still do bribe major political parties that will support them and keep corporations and big business in power and reap massive profits. In addition, the Electoral Commission gave the Labor party $16,710,043; the Liberals $17,956,326 and the Greens $3,316,702. It is in fashions similar to this that the Bourgeoisie effectively rig today's "democratic" elections.

So once the working class destroys private property rights and the capitalist system, representative democracy will be the way to go, right? No corporate bribes and no favouritism will mean efficient and true working class rule, right? No. For a class to rule society it must rule both political and economical domains. If workers' ownership were instituted but the representative democratic system still in place, then the working class could not rule society. If a minority class wants to achieve power it endorses and rules through systems that concentrate wealth and power into the hands of a few. So, logically, the working class - which is a majority class - must utilise a system which does not concentrate wealth and power into the hands of a few - but a system which gives fair shares of wealth and power to the masses. If workers' ownership were instituted, this would be half the job done. But the other half of the job lies in the political domain. How can a majority class truly rule when it uses a system that concentrates power into the hands of a few?

The answer lies in direct democracy. This means that all the executive and legislative power would be given to everyone of voting age - rather than giving it to unaccountable minorities that are supposed to represent the people. At least many Marxists today that are in favour of a representative democratic system allow for the recall of elected officials. But this does not stop the problem of inefficient rule. Efficient rule would be local workers' councils run in a system of direct democracy by the people to decide upon local issues that matter to that locality. The same councils would also be the holding grounds for referendums that matter in regional levels. This truly constitutes class rule as the working class itself rules both political and economical domains.

[B]The answer to the alternative to capitalism and Bourgeois democracy lies in the will and the strength of the working class.[/B]

[B]Say no to reformism and say no to representative democracy![/B] [B]

Why should we settle for second best?[/B]

Statistics for corporate bribes and Electoral Commission funding from: [URL]http://www.resistance.org.au/wrsf6[/URL]
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 2361 Comments 4 Email Blog Entry
Total Comments 4

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    CartCollector's Avatar
    What are your thoughts on demarchy? It makes certain decisions more efficient: it's expensive to have an election that involves every citizen within a country, especially if that country has 100 million or more citizens. Demarchy streamlines national decision making by having it done by a group who are given enough time to come to an informed decision. Also, it's difficult to have it rigged by an elite class if the demarchs are chosen randomly from the public as they're supposed to be. The problems I can see are if a demarch rules poorly, it might be difficult to remove them, but there's the possibility of allowing the reselection of a certain demarch if there's enough votes against them through a recall vote. The other problem is if demarchs aren't selected randomly- there's the possibility of something like the all-white jury reappearing under demarchy if not carefully guarded against.
    Posted 25th April 2010 at 03:47 by CartCollector CartCollector is offline
  2. Old Comment
    You can avoid all the hassle of shitty ruling by instituting direct democracy. I figure the people should make their own decisions in a democracy, wouldn't you agree?

    As I said in the post; "It doesn't matter how rulers come to rule, but that rulers rule in the first place."
    Posted 25th April 2010 at 12:33 by AK AK is offline
  3. Old Comment
    CartCollector's Avatar
    I agree. The problems are time and the amount of labor necessary to gather everyone's votes. Is it really feasible to have every citizen vote on every issue that confronts a country?
    Posted 27th April 2010 at 03:33 by CartCollector CartCollector is offline
  4. Old Comment
    [QUOTE=CartCollector;bt2558]I agree. The problems are time and the amount of labor necessary to gather everyone's votes. Is it really feasible to have every citizen vote on every issue that confronts a country?[/QUOTE]
    All the voting and shit would be done locally at workers councils and whatnot. Presumably electronically.
    Posted 27th April 2010 at 08:45 by AK AK is offline
 

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.